Maribelle DeJesus Sparks Claims Suzy Theodoro is a liar.
1. Let’s look at what Maribelle is stating about Suzy Theodoro.
To note: She has absolutely no factual proof of anything she says and she is related to the judge, but let’s disregard that and review her claims.
As for that her mother Susy Theodore oh! The woman who made the DECISION TO LEAVE AN ABANDON Sophia at her most vulnerable state without saying anything to the hospital staff.
Just got up at the middle of the night and ABANDON HER BABY GIRL.
It wasn’t the hospital’s fault that Susy decided to leave her baby girl behind without leaving any information like a phone number or address family emergency contact.
SUZY YOU LEFT HER THER!
The hospital is mandated to report to DCF any abnormalities.
If it were my child I would have stayed, worked with DCF to make sure I left that hospital with my daughter in hand.
You didn’t Susy Theodoro!
You and your husband left her there.
Where were you going? What was the rush?
She writes in another part of the post:
They were offered a lawyer which they refused as well. Guess it was more important to troll and post on Facebook about the family who cared for her baby and loved her baby unconditionally. I read these posts and what lies!
May the foster family look like they were the bad people.
Susie, you were the one who banded your baby and left with no name or known address. Then have the audacity to call the DCF a week later to get Sophia back. This was not a used car this was a little human being you left.
All the videos on Facebook to make herself look like a murder, the “oh poor me” syndrome. And engaging with radical groups to help fuel her Lies so she doesn’t have to deal with the truth of her abandonment of her only daughter. Groups that created the page “stand for Sophia” but Susie never showed up to the rallies or the court’s visits in Connecticut.
Then there is a go fund me page created for lawyer fees.
Post from Maribelle DeJesus Sparks Social Media pages. She has not once ounce of evidence to any of these claims. They are purely emotionally driven and with ill intent.
First let’s look at the facts ( because that is all that matters)
Maribelle states that Suzy left no information for the hospital staff.
Just got up at the middle of the night and ABANDON HER BABY GIRL.
How could this be since they had DCF contacting them at their home in Tennessee?
Let’s look at this claim and see if it makes any sense.
1. Suzy and peter are the loving parents to two amazing little boys. They are a strong christian family, with extended relatives. Peter has a great job where he makes more than enough money to support his family.
2. Why would a mother who was awaiting her first little girl after two boys, who had bought special little girl nursery furniture, tons of dresses and painted pictures for her nursery, had a baby shower for her first little girl, just up and abandon her? She wouldn’t. It is a lie that Maribelle is using to try and justify any guilt she has for keeping this little girl away from her mother.
3. Why would Sofia’s real family, anxiously await her arrival with other little girl cousins, grandparents, and other extended friends and family just up and abandoned her? They wouldn’t, its a lie. Below are some pictures of the Theodoros preparing for Sofia’s arrival. They were extremely excited about her arrival and wanted and still want her very badly.
A closet full of clothes and dresses Suzy theodoro bought in anticipation and excitment of her first daughter to be born, sofia theodoro
Sofia Theodoro’s nusery put together by Suzy Theodoro in anticipation and excitment of the arrival of her first daughter_
Sofia Theodoro’s nursery put together by her birth parents Suzy and Peter Theodoro in anticipation of her arrival_
Artwork created for Sofia by her mother Suzy Theodoro in anticipation and excitement of her first little girl_
Maribelle states that Suzy and her husband left in the middle of the night.
Suzy was discharged from the hospital, and if you have ever had a baby, you know that you are discharged after a few days. Suzy HAD to leave the hospital and was not allowed to take Sofia with her. They had her in a high-security nursery where Suzy was not allowed to be and didn’t have access to.
In addition to that, they lived out of town, had stayed in Connecticut for a week until they realized that they were not going to be able to get Sofia. They were extremely naive about what was happening. They were being told by DCF to follow proper procedure and if they did, they would get Sofia back. They were being groomed to leave the state with out worry. They did all they could to try and make the hospital staff understand that they were not a threat to their daughter, but the Hospital was not listening. They didn’t care and had ulterior motives towards the Theodoros.
Maribelle states that Suzy and her husband were offered a lawyer that they refused.
How convenient for her to accuse the Theodoro’s especially when Ms. Sparks, not only works at the courthouse but is also the niece of the Judge presiding over the case. Conflict of interest? We think so.
In regards to the lawyer they were offered, this lawyer was on the side of the court, the lawyer mislead the Theodoros and took advantage of their naivety about the situation. So naturally, they were terrified to accept another lawyer from the court.
Maribelle states that the hospital is mandated to report to DCF any abnormalities.
What abnormalities did they see? There were no specific claims against Suzy or her husband. The ONLY claim they had against the parents was that they were uncooperative, which again is proven to be false through numerous videos and written evidence. Suzy’s toxicology test came back negative and her psych evaluation came back normal. So if the hospital felt something was wrong they took all the proper procedures, and everything came back negative. They should have released Sofia at that point. They had absolutely no just cause to keep Sofia in state care.
Also, it is detailed in video recordings that the Theodoros were offering to take Sofia to a pediatrician in town. They were offering anything that the hospital wanted them to do in order to show them they were not a threat to their daughter.
In addition, the Theodoros are on Video, showing that they were speaking and cooperating with DCF. They were also extremely afraid and were naive to the situation they found themselves in. This middle-class couple, with two happy children, didn’t understand what exactly was happening to them.
Suzy Theodoro’s results from testing:
Normal Psych Evaluation and negative toxicology report.
Maribelle states that Sofia is thiving with her as if she would not be thriving with Suzy.
Well, history is the best prediction of future behavior, correct?
Suzy Theodoro has two beautiful boys that are thriving in their home. They are very happy, well taken care of, and have a secure and stable home with Suzy and her husband Peter.
Suzy and Peter are wonderful parents and the proof is how happy their boys are.
Suzy and Peter have an environment where Sofia would also thrive. They have a large extended family of grandparents, aunts, and uncles that Sofia would grow up around, who would love and protect her as their own.
This statement is very telling of the foster mother. She is not being unbiased as a foster mother should and shows manipulative behavior with this comment. She wants to portray the image that Sofia will only thrive in her care.
A foster mother’s role is to help the birth parents and reunite them with their child. The goal is always the family reunification. Why is that not happening here?
It is clear that Suzy and Her husband are good parents based on the condition of their other two children. It is clear that they want her.
It is clear that Sofia has an extended family that wants her as well since Peter’s parents also filed for custodial rights over Sofia and want to adopt her if the courts will not give Sofia back to her birth parents. Why are they not taking that course of action?
Watch the video below showing what good instincts Suzy has with her daughter. She is a natural with children.
Maribelle states that Suzy Facebook page and all the videos make her look like the Marter with the “oh poor me” syndrome.
First, how extremely unempathetic to Suzy Theodoro. The Foster mother has just outed her self as being extremely biased towards the birth parents, the Theodoros. It is telling she has an ulterior motive towards this case.
How can factual videos be lies? Where you have actual video of a crime, how can you deny it?
The Theodoro’s have done one thing correct, which is to document everything as much as they can. They have phone recordings with their corrupt lawyer misleading them, they have emails and video evidence of the unfair treatment they received at Middlesex hospital. You don’t have to take the Theodoro’s word for it, because they have SO much evidence, it is easy to believe them.
Maribelle Sparks is making claims without ANY factual evidence to back them up. This make’s it clear that she has a vested interest in keeping Sofia, other than for her well being.
Responsibilities of a Foster Parent
Responsibilities to the Birth Parents:
- To cooperate with visitation; to provide transportation for the child or if visitation is in your home, making the birth parent feel comfortable and allowing time with the child.
- To help the child maintain a realistic perception and attitude towards his/her own parents.
- To provide necessary and appropriate information about a child’s growth and development such as likes, dislikes, behaviors, feelings, etc. to the parent.
- To prepare the child to return home.
Responsibilities to the Child:
- To provide a safe and comfortable family environment for the child.
- To provide for the child’s basic physical and emotional needs as you would for your own child.
- To ensure that the child attends school; monitor educational progress; be aware of special needs; express appreciation for accomplishments.
- To provide appropriate clothing.
- To attend to medical and dental needs including regular checkups as well as attending to other special needs of the child – i.e. educational, therapeutic, etc.
- To help and guide children through the grieving and adjustment process that accompanies the removal from their families.
- To help maintain a realistic relationship with their families through participation with visitation and active consideration of the children’s feelings. To assist children in preparing to return home or being moved to a permanent adoptive home.
- To provide recreational, enriching activities that will promote the healthy development of children.
- To maintain a record of their time in care, developmental milestones, photographs, report cards, etc.
- To provide consistent and realistic discipline and guidance that is age-appropriate and does not involve corporal punishment of any kind.
More Facts because that’s what we judge this case on. Facts and evidence.
Please visit the home page of standforsofia.com to see evidence to support Suzy and Peter Theodoro’s case.
Maribelle Sparks is a 50 something-year-old woman on her second or third marriage. Saddened that she couldn’t have any more children with her new husband, they applied to be foster parents two years ago, requesting a Puerto Rican looking child. They wanted an infant. There is documentation in the foster care system verifying this information.
She has had an unstable marital life, has three boys from previous marriages. There is a divorce record on file for M. DeJesus with her previous address in Willimantic, Connecticut.
Contrary to Suzy Theodoro who has only been married once to Peter Theodoro. They have been in a very happy and healthy marriage for many years.
Suzy and Peter have two boys, Sofia’s brothers, who they had been raising, had NEVER had any investigation or charges with any other court for any kind of child neglect, ever. No evidence was ever found that Suzy and Peter’s names were NEVER found on any court register for any kind of child neglect, anywhere.
Suzy Theodoro was a nanny growing up and through college where she watched the mayor’s children of her town, whom he entrusted his children with Suzy completely. Suzy was known for being good with children throughout her entire life
Maribelle Sparks, in her early 50’s, is too old now to have a child with her new husband Michael Sparks, a member of law enforcement. So it is convenient for the mother of three boys from previous marriages, to have a girl.
Maribelle Sparks is related to the Judge, Norma Figuera. She is the judge’s niece and the Judge has refused to give the Theodoro’s a fair trial. She has refused to see evidence, refuses to give them rights, and has not followed the protocol for family reunification. See pictures in the blog post.
With Maribelle’s relation to the Judge, law enforcement, and employment, it is easy to see how the Theodoro’s case has been extremely unfair and even criminal. from the Middletown courts and DCF.
Sofia has two brothers who are growing up without their sister due to the selfish behavior of the courts, the foster mother, DCF, and Middlesex Hospital.
Suzy Theodoro and her husband Peter were profiled when they walked into Middlesex hospital, unfairly, for NO REASON. The hospital is doing everything it can to cover up their crimes and their partnership with the DCF. They work together lock-in-step with Title IV laws which are extremely abused and corrupt. There is NO accountability for the hospitals, DCF workers, and courts.
The Theodoro’s have been denied their constitutional rights in every way.